Journal of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Management 2016. 2(1/2):34-37.

The knowledge of pharmacists about cosmetics in pharmacies of Tehran, Iran
Golbarg Ghiasi, Farshad Hashemian, Abbas Kebriaeezadeh, Shaghayegh Ghiasi

Abstract


Background: Considering that the cosmetics today are not have used only for luxury purposes and have effective medicinal components, pharmacists require knowing about the components and ingredients of such products with a scientific level on different usages. As mentioned above, the main objective of this study is investigating the knowledge of pharmacists employed in the pharmacies of Tehran about cosmetics.
Methods: This study has been conducted by descriptive method using surveys. For completing the surveys, referring to the pharmacies, in personal, and delivering the forms to pharmacists, they were asked to complete it in the same time and they returned it to the surveyor.
Results: According to results, it can be seen that 57% of pharmacists generally answered correctly, i.e., the information of almost 43% of pharmacists for sunscreen cares seems not to be enough. Furthermore, the awareness of pharmacists about depilatories and their physicochemical properties and ingredients was weak (21.5%).
Conclusion: It was considered as the only significant relation between age of pharmacists and their knowledge such that by increase in their age, their knowledge to two products, sunscreen care, and depilatory was decreased. On the other side, in Iran, the role of pharmacists has not been defined in this field-necessity of providing cosmetics information.


Keywords


Knowledge; Pharmacist; Cosmetic

Full Text:

PDF

References


(1) Schofield JK, Fleming D, Grindlay D, Williams H. Skin conditions are the commonest new reason people present to general practitioners in England and Wales. Br J Dermatol 2011; 165(5): 1044-50.

(2) Proprietary Association of Great Britain and Reader's Digest. A picture of health: A survey of the nation's approach to everyday health and wellbeing. London, UK: Proprietary Association of Great Britain (PAGB); 2005.

(3) Dutton G. A changing landscape for cosmetics and personal care. Chemical Market Reporter 1999; 255(14): 99-102.

(4) Cosmetics and toiletries market in China, A market analysis [Online]. [cited 2010]; Available from: URL: www.accessasia.co.uk

(5) Green CF, Mottram DR, Rowe PH, Pirmohamed M.

Attitudes and knowledge of hospital pharmacists to adverse drug reaction reporting. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2001; 51(1): 81-6.

(6) U.S.Food and Drug Administration (FAD). Is it a cosmetic, a drug, or both? (Or Is It Soap?) [Online]. [cited 2010 Apr 30]; Available from: URL: http://www.fda.gov/Cosmetics/GuidanceRegulation/LawsRegulations/ucm074201.htm

(7) Great Britain. Pharmacy in england: Building on strengths-delivering the future. London, UK: The Stationery Office; 2008.

(8) Bucalo AJ. State of the industry: The emerging markets march forward. Global cosmetic industry 1999; 164(6): 32-41.

(9) Leonard C. Global beauty industry trends 2011. Skin Inc 2011. Available from: URL:

http://www.skininc.com/spabusiness/trends/126516783.html

(10) Smith FJ, Salkind MR. Presentation of clinical symptoms to community pharmacists in London. J Soc Adm Pharm 1999; 7(4): 221-4.

(11) Hafejee A, Coulson IH. Community pharmacists' role in

managing common skin problems. Br J Dermatol 2006; 155(6): 1297.

(12) Tucker R. Community pharmacists' perceptions of the skin conditions they encounter and how they view their role in dermatological care. Int J Pharm Pract 2012; 20(5): 344-6.

(13) Tucker R. An exploratory study of UK community pharmacist's perceptions of the skin conditions they encounter: prevalence, reasons for referral and over-the-counter dermatological wish list. SelfCare 2013; 4(1): 3-17.

(14) Tucker R, Patel M, Layton AM, Walton S. An examination of the comparative ability of primary care health professionals in the recognition and treatment of a range of dermatological conditions. SelfCare 2013; 4(4): 87-97.

(15) Granas AG, Buajordet M, Stenberg-Nilsen H, Harg P, Horn AM. Pharmacists' attitudes towards the reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions in Norway. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2007; 16(4): 429-34.

(16) Herdeiro MT, Figueiras A, Polonia J, Gestal-Otero JJ. Influence of pharmacists' attitudes on adverse drug reaction reporting: a case-control study in Portugal. Drug Saf 2006; 29(4): 331-40.

(17) Vessal G, Mardani Z, Mollai M. Knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of pharmacists to adverse drug reaction reporting in Iran. Pharm World Sci 2009; 31(2): 183-7.

(18) Plunkett A, Lau P, Stewart K, Marks R. Skin conditions in the pharmacy: consumer satisfaction and economic considerations. Int J Pharm Pract 2001; 9(1): 9-14.

(19) Tucker RP. Exploring prisoners' views of a pharmacist-led dermatology clinic. Pharmacy in Practice 2004; 4: 113-4.

(20) Tucker RP. Exploring the views of prisoners attending a pharmacist run dermatology clinic. Pharm J 2005; 274(232): 3.

(21) Ersser SJ, Cowdell FC, Latter SM, Healy E. Self-management experiences in adults with mild-moderate psoriasis: an exploratory study and implications for improved support. Br J Dermatol 2010; 163(5): 1044-9.

(22) Hughes L, Whittlesea C, Luscombe D. Patients' knowledge and perceptions of the side-effects of OTC medication. J Clin Pharm Ther 2002; 27(4): 243-8.

(23) Tucker R. The medicines use review in patients with chronic skin diseases: are pharmacists doing them and how confident are they? Int J Pharm Pract 2013; 21(3): 202-4.

(24) Bagole LE, Beaumont A, Morgan I. Outcomes of medicines use reviews for people with asthma. Int J Pharm Prac 2007; 15(2): B66.

(25) Carr A, Patel R, Jones M, Suleman A. A Pilot Study of a community pharmacist intervention to promote the effective use of emollients in childhood eczema. Pharm J 2007; 278: 319-22.

(26) Tinkler C, Herkes D, Holden M, Hagan M. Investigating the contribution of community pharmacists in meeting the needs of patients with atopic eczema, in collaboration with GPs. In J Pharm Pract 2005; 13(Suppl): R360.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.